> On 19 Apr, 2015, at 13:20, Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Reporting the latency under load as frequency (inverse of delay time) would > be nice in that higher numbers denote a "better” link, but has the issue that > it is going to be hard to quickly add different latency sources/components...
Personally I’d say that this disadvantage matters more to us scientists and engineers than to end-users. Frequency readouts are probably more accessible to the latter. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
