On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 15:26 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Do I need to read this as all Google servers == all servers :) > > Read again what I wrote. Don't play with my words.
> BTW if a paced flow from Google shares a bloated buffer with a non > paced flow from a non Google server, doesn't this turn out to be a > performance penalty for the paced flow? > > What do you think ? Do you think Google would still use sch_fq if this was a potential problem ? > fq_codel gives incentives to do pacing but if it's not deployed what's > the performance gain of using pacing? 1) fq_codel has nothing to do with pacing. 2) sch_fq doesn't depend on fq_codel or codel being used anywhere. It seems you are quite confused, and unfortunately I wont take time to explain anything. Run experiments, then draw your own conclusions. _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
