Neil Davies <[email protected]> writes: > ∆Q is both the concept (quallity attenuation - the fact that delay and > potential for loss is both conserved and only every increases[1]) and > for its representation as an improper random variable (one who's CDF > doesn't necessarily reach one).
Right, got it. > One of my adages is that "network quality" doesn' t exist - just like > you can't buy a box of "dark" and make a room dark by opening the box, > you can't buy a box of "network quality" - delivering quality in > networks is managing (through bounding) the "quality attenuation" That much seems obvious. But do you have any analytical models that can actual predict the magnitude of the quality attenuation for a given network, say? And if so, are they available somewhere? Also, some of the documents linked to from your web site seems to allude to a scheduling algorithm of some sort. Is that available in paper form (or better, code!) anywhere? Thanks for your answers, will also take a look at the paper you linked in your other email. :) -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
