The legal answer is "read the IPR disclosure at the IETF" and "read the copy 
write notice in the code".

I think that you will like what you find, though....... The broad intent is to 
fix the bloat problem in as many places as possible.

Bill VerSteeg

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Simon Barber
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 8:03 PM
To: Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco); 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Rong Pan (ropan); Preethi Natarajan (prenatar)
Subject: Re: [Bloat] FQ-PIE kernel module implementation

Very cool. Does this mean that Cisco are not planning on enforcing any IP 
rights over PIE?

Simon
On 6/4/2015 3:06 PM, Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco) wrote:
Hi all,

I'm Hironori Okano and Fred's intern.
I'd like to let you know that I have implemented FQ-PIE as a linux kernel 
module "fq-pie" and iproute2 for fq-pie.
This was done in collaboration with others at Cisco including Fred Baker, Rong 
Pan, Bill Ver Steeg, and Preethi Natarajan.

The source codes are in my github repository. I attached patch file 
"fq-pie_patch.tar.gz" to this email also.
I'm using the latest linux kernel 
(git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git)

fq-pie kernel module
https://github.com/hironoriokano/fq-pie.git

iproute2 for fq-pie
https://github.com/hironoriokano/iproute2_fq-pie.git

If you have any comments, please reach out to me.

Best regards,

Hironori Okano
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>




_______________________________________________

Bloat mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to