> > > 7) transmission ate a metric ton of cpu (30% on a i3) at these speeds. > > 8) My (cable) link actually is 140mbit down, 11 up. I did not much > care for asymmetric networks when the ratios were 6x1, so 13x1 is way > up there.... > > Anyway, 20% packet loss of the "right" packets was survivable. I will > subject myself to the same test on other fq or aqms. And, if I can > force myself to, with no aqm or fq. For SCIENCE! > > Attention, DMCA lawyers: Please send takedown notices to > bufferbloat-research@/dev/null.org . One of the things truly > astonishing about this is that in 12 hours in one night I downloaded > more stuff than I could ever watch (mp4) or listen to (even in flac > format) in several days of dedicated consumption. And it all just got > rm -rf'd. It occurs to me there is a human upper bound to how much > data one would ever want to consume, and we cracked that limit at > 20mbit, with only 4k+ video driving demand any harder. When we started > bufferbloat.net 20mbit downlinks were the best you could easily get.
Linux ISOs are a great way to saturate your download. I have enough downloaded that while seeding, I can sustain over 10Mb/s, but don't expect to saturate your upload since they're already heavily seeded, but less so since I stopped recently.
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
