[offtopic] And this kind of thing drives my paranoid friends *batty*.
--dave
I suspect none of them ever worked in a large enough organization
that it had lots of inertia... which I've seen in a five-person team (;-))
On 08/10/15 03:36 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
The *only* report of interference with radars I have been able to find
is a vaguely worded complaint in a 2011 document, where 40 reports of
interference were found, 25 at one airport in Puerto Rico.
The FCC has utterly failed to provide proof for it's argument, thus far.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
David Collier-Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Based on that, it sounds like the issue is that you can buy a 5 GHz
> device off the shelf, then hack the firmware to re-enable those
> frequencies. And the FCC is proposing this action because people have
> been doing exactly that and the FCC has received reports from the
> airports of such interference on those frequencies.
I too would like like know more about these reports.
(would be funny if in fact it was screwed up *vendor* firmware?)
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
[email protected] | -- Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
