> On 8 Apr, 2016, at 05:51, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > The session was closed by > ted hardie's refresher of how rfc791's original use case, but the > slides don't do it justice.
It’s perhaps worth remembering that RFC791 defined the TOS/Precedence bits as end-to-end stable, a property explicitly removed by Diffserv. Of all of Diffserv’s failings, I think this has become the most troublesome. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
