Good point. Flow isolation gives some kind of “privacy”. But I guess this is not the worse privacy violation one would be concerned about in today Internet.
On Thu 19 Jul 2018 at 12:52, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > hahaha. Aside from their last slide not recommending fq, that was an > enjoyable read. fq in this case (but I would deprioritize ping > responses slightly in the general case) makes the actual observed load > even more invisible. > > I think traceroute would have been a better tool for this study. > > and smokeping remains a very useful tool for those that can deploy it. > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:44 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> > wrote: > > > > This was presented at today's maprg session at the IETF: > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-maprg-is-bufferbloat-a-privacy-issue-brian-trammell-00 > > > > -Toke > > _______________________________________________ > > Bloat mailing list > > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > > > > -- > > Dave Täht > CEO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-669-226-2619 > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat