It's really weird to worry about throughput and latency at 300km/h vs 350km/hr, being as the fastest US train I've ever been on rarely cracks 100kph.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.04823.pdf - the handover bit (section 5.2 and later) was pretty interesting. Round-trip-time (RTT). As shown in Fig. 6, BBR has more than twice lower RTTs than CUBIC (e.g., 191.53 ms versus 431.35 ms at 300 km/h, and 148.63 ms versus 345.02 ms at 350 km/h for median value) due to their different CCA design rationales: BBR intends to suppress the RTT to overcome the bufferbloat problem [24 -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat