Hi, Am 21.03.19 um 09:02 schrieb Bob Briscoe: > Just to rapidly reply, > > > On 21/03/2019 07:46, Jonathan Morton wrote: >> The ECN field was never intended to be used as a classifier, except to >> distinguish Not-ECT flows from ECT flows (which a middlebox does need >> to know, to choose between mark and drop behaviours). It was intended >> to be used to convey congestion information from the network to the >> receiver. SCE adheres to that ideal. > > Each PHB has a forwarding behaviour a DSCP re-marking behaviour and an > ECN marking behaviour. The ECN field is the claissifer for the ECN > marking behaviour.
That's exactly the reason, why using ECT(1) as classifier for L4S behavior is not the right choice. L4S should use a DSCP for classification, because it is actually defining a PHB. Regards Roland _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
