On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 22:08, Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just wondered if anybody has any reasonable estimate how many end-users > actually employ fair-queueing AQMs with active ECN-marking for ingress > traffic @home? I am trying to understand whether L4S approach to simply > declare these as insignificant in number is justifiable?
L4S people are concerned by RFC 3168 / "classic" ECN bottlenecks *without* fq. I don't think there would be any such ingress shapers configured on home gateways. Certainly not by anyone on this list... anyone running non-fq codel or flowblind cake for ingress shaping? -Ryan _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
