I am with David, this is going to be fun on densely populated apartment
buildings. For people with no RF-competition it is sort of a "nice" trick to
more or less go "duplex".
What a I missing?
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Sep 13, 2019, at 08:13, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There's more to it than that.
>
> https://www-res.cablelabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/24150908/Dual-Channel-Wi-Fi-Performance-Test-Report-June-2019.pdf
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 7:03 AM David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> it's an optimization that will work well when there is only one person using
>> the
>> network, and utterly collapse when there is a lot of use.
>>
>> it assumes that 'high priority' and bulk things only move in one direction,
>> it
>> uses more channels, which will cause more collisions with other users and
>> other
>> networks.
>>
>> a fairly typical type of idea to someone who doesn't look at what's actually
>> happening at the RF level.
>>
>> David Lang
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:47:38 +0900
>>> From: Etienne Champetier <[email protected]>
>>> To: bloat <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [Bloat] Dual Channel Wi-Fi
>>>
>>> I'm curious what people on this mailing list think about this Wi-Fi
>>> optimisation
>>>
>>> https://www.cablelabs.com/technologies/dual-channel-wi-fi
>>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/9972
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-831-205-9740
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
