> On Dec 2, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do hate watching y'all continually concede the "latency" point and > have to argue on the "chosen ground" of single or dualq about > long-running tcp flows.
I don’t think we’ve conceded that. It would be possible to run more tests on a LAN with a shorter Codel interval and show ~1ms TCP RTT, and perhaps we should. I don’t think there's any fundamental reason why one signaling mechanism or the other should ultimately be any better in this regard. _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
