Dear all,
> On Apr 24, 2020, at 07:49, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Matt Taggart | 2020-04-23 15:47:19 [-0700]: > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890343#34 >> >> If you have anything to add concernting changing this (or other defaults) >> please mail that bug. Let's get Debian up to date! > > +1 > > Yes Dave, I think it's time to boost this bug report. Can you give your > comments and objections to the use of fifo fast? I think a little bit pressure > here and there and you will finally make many Debian users happier! ;-) > > I don't know if the discussion will arise that fq_codel will not be the > perfect fit for everybody, thus the use of "safer pfifo_fast". I think we So pfifo_fast employs a static precedence system in which high priority traffic can completely starve lower priority traffic, that is the opposite of safe, by virtue of that feature alone pfifo_fast should be relegated to those specific cases where such behaviour is desired instead of foring it upon the unwashed and enexpecting messes, no? Best Regards Sebastian > should take care of the average user, professionals using Debian already know > what to configure and how - here we should focus on the average user (Laptop, > Desktop). > > hgn > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
