not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash directing flows at one or another.
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling <[email protected]> wrote: > > When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch set to > make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great > > http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes > > Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right thing, > aye? > > As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged upstream :( > it's so useful for multiple uplinks > > -- Dan > > On May 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rich Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I > wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our ISP > and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router. > > I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3. > > But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control > (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect. > > Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks. > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat -- Make Music, Not War Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729 _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
