Jonathan Foulkes <j...@jonathanfoulkes.com> writes: >> Right, so some benefit might be possible here. Does the NIC have >> multiple hardware queues (`ls /sys/class/net/$IFACE/queues` should tell >> you)? > > Here is the output of: > /sys/devices/virtual/net/eth0.2/queues# ls > rx-0 tx-0 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/eth0.2/queues/rx-0# cat rps_cpus > 0 > > /sys/devices/virtual/net/eth0.2/queues/tx-0# cat xps_cpus > 0
Hmm, so no multiq support on this driver, it looks like. So not sure to what extent it will be possible to effectively utilise both cores on this box, sadly :/ >> Yup, the number of cores is only going to go up, so for CAKE to stay >> relevant it'll need to be able to take advantage of this eventually :) > > True, the mid-range market is already there, and so soon will be the > lower-end. And with ISPs lighting up more and more capacity, the > demand will be there to be able to shape higher and higher rates. > > But I agree with Jonathan Morton that once every deice has sufficient > capacity, more makes no difference. I went for 100/15 to 300/24 and > never noticed the difference. > > Hell, there are days I switch to my backup 10/0.7 DSL line for a test, > and forget to switch back, and will work for hours and not notice I’m > not on the 300Mbps line ;-) Heh, if you can live with a 10/0.7 line without noticing I think you're more patient than me ;) But still, fair point; doesn't mean that people will still not *want* to run a higher speeds, though... :) -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
