Sina Khanifar <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that given this limitation of browser-based tests, maybe the > users you have in mind are not our target audience. Our goal is to make > an easy-to-use bufferbloat test "for the rest of us." For > technically-minded gamers, running flent will likely give much better > results. I'd love for it to be otherwise, so we may try to tinker with > things to see if we can get CPU usage down and simultaneously deal with > the UDP question below.
I think that your goals are good. In many cases around here, the higher speed connections are also more bloated, and the challenge is convincing a home owner that they will get better interactive performance on a VDSL2 than a FTTH, if they upgrade their router. (This is particularly true if their wifi is slower than their downlink, and also bloated) It's about quality over quantity. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
