Aaron Wood <[email protected]> writes: > iperf3 isn’t “academic”, but is more focused on scientific computing (ESNet > pushes a LOT of data CERN around, on 100Gbps backbones). > > But that also skews their usage/needs. Very high throughput bulk transfers > with long durations, over mixed systems. Not as many concerns about > latency, except in that latency can cause messes with congestion > control.
Yeah, I'm not too concerned about the code quality of iperf either - if it ever reaches (rough) feature parity with netperf (list I posted up-thread) I'm quite happy to turn it into an automatic fallback for netperf in Flent, the same way we do with some of the other tools... -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
