Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > As much as I dislike the cgnat I don't see how starlink had any other > choice, and the layer below that is hopefully capable of carrying > ipv6 well.
IPv6 first, with NAT64 would have been significantly better and easier. _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
