Great news, Matt! If I may make a recommendation, IMO a standalone working 
latency test would have greater utility than integrating such a measurement 
into an existing test & so it may have the opportunity of more widespread usage.

JL

From: Bloat <[email protected]> on behalf of Matt Mathis via 
Bloat <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Matt Mathis <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 00:52
To: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Cc: bloat <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] Airbnb

I am part of the M-Lab team.

For years we published a "jitter" metric that I considered to be bogus, 
basically max_rtt - min_rtt, (which were builtin Web100 instruments).

In 2019, we transitioned from web100 to "standard" linux tcp_info, which does 
not capture max_rtt.   Since the web100 jitter was viewed as bogus, we did not 
attempt to reconstruct it, although we could have.   Designing and implementing 
a new latency metric was on my todo list from the beginning of that transition, 
but chronically preempted by more pressing problems.

It finally made it to the top of my queue which is why I am suddenly not 
lurking here and the new rpm list.  I was very happy to see the Apple 
responsiveness metric, and realized that M-Lab can implement a TCP version of 
it, that can be computed both in real time on future tests and retroactively 
over archived tests collected over the last 12 years.

This quick paper might be of interest: Preliminary Longitudinal Study of 
Internet 
Responsiveness<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1HkeJTgwLdbbdHe0dF9SWrpr8Vt7ngnovLpdDTScuUtk/edit*heading=h.sy6m01i6oa9a__;Iw!!CQl3mcHX2A!WTavRmT2GnSUSVpvPCPdmBuNtOJI_zDP1WOHE-jy8tMiXBE-CxDospZUjNote1PXn0DhWQ$>
.
Thanks,
--MM--
The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay

We must not tolerate intolerance;
       however our response must be carefully measured:
            too strong would be hypocritical and risks spiraling out of control;
            too weak risks being mistaken for tacit approval.


On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:27 PM Dave Collier-Brown 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:

Knowing programmers, I'd more likely assume latency when it's easiest to 
measure. At a guess, either

  *   average of upload or download
  *   average of download (as it comes first)

--dave (call me "Wally" (:-)) c-b



On 2021-08-09 4:24 p.m., Jonathan Morton wrote:

On 9 Aug, 2021, at 10:25 pm, Dave Collier-Brown 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
 wrote:



My run of it reported latency, but without any qualifiers...

One would reasonable assume that's idle latency, then.



 - Jonathan Morton

_______________________________________________

Bloat mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!WTavRmT2GnSUSVpvPCPdmBuNtOJI_zDP1WOHE-jy8tMiXBE-CxDospZUjNote1Oa4DQV1Q$>

--

David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify

System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 |              -- Mark Twain


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any 
and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the 
person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or 
disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If 
you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox 
and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an 
express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor 
does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a 
contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject 
to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding 
until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized 
signatory.
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!WTavRmT2GnSUSVpvPCPdmBuNtOJI_zDP1WOHE-jy8tMiXBE-CxDospZUjNote1Oa4DQV1Q$>
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to