On 12/1/21 16:09, David Lang wrote:

On Wed, 1 Dec 2021, David P. Reed wrote:

To say it again: More memory *doesn't* improve throughput when the
queue depths exceed one packet on average

slight disagreement here. the buffer improves throughput up to the
point where it handles one burst of packets. When packets are
transmitted individually, that's about one packet (insert hand waving
about scheduling delays, etc). but with wifi where you can transmit
multiple packets in one airtime slot, you need enough buffer to handle
the entire burst.


A different hand-wave: what about "packet trains"? They make using
queuing networks mis-estimate, do they come close together enough that
routers need to be sensitive to them, and affect the number of packets
they need to buffer?

--dave

--
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
[email protected] |              -- Mark Twain


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any 
and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the 
person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or 
disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If 
you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox 
and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an 
express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor 
does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a 
contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject 
to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding 
until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized 
signatory.
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to