These are some recent Telco measurements (Figure 3) from one of the papers from that workshop
http://buffer-workshop.stanford.edu/papers/paper7.pdf There on can observe that most flows in Internet are <60 ms. I assume applying Appenzeller's rule is not a bad idea for static buffer sizing. However, as Toke said, AQM is of course better.. Best Amr -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Bloat <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bloat Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. März 2022 17:32 An: Michael Menth <[email protected]>; bloat <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [Bloat] Up-to-date buffer sizes? Michael Menth <[email protected]> writes: > Hi all, > > are there up-to-date references giving evidence about typical buffer > sizes for various link speeds and technologies? Heh. There was a whole workshop on it a couple of years ago; not sure if it concluded anything: http://buffer-workshop.stanford.edu/program/ But really, asking about buffer sizing is missing the point; if you have static buffers with no other management (like AQM and FQ) you're most likely already doing it wrong... :) -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
