I think it depends on the audience and how much time they will spend on
watching.
For hard-core gamers your ideas will likely work well. For a more general
public I think Lieuwe's idea might be more obvious, as comparing smooth versus
stuttering display should be pretty salient even for people that do not know
the game well.
I wonder whether the test should not also include say two other machines on the
same WAN link that are busy streaming in fullHD or UHD just to spice things up
a bit. After all on a link that is otherwise idle all games should work
reasonably well, it is only under competition from other traffic and transient
congestion when an AQM would really shine.
Regards
Sebastian
> On Sep 15, 2022, at 19:37, Arie via Bloat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Games with network indicators. BF V has a good one built-in that can be
> activated in the multiplayer options. High ping, variable ping and loss will
> be indicated with BF V's indicator icons and a detailed overlay if you enable
> it.
>
> Source-based games that allow you to open net_graph, e.g. Team Fortress 2
> with net_graph 5 enabled. You can see rising ping and packet loss clearly on
> the graph.
>
> On Thu, 15 Sept 2022 at 15:54, Livingood, Jason via Bloat
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Some of my colleagues in the office are recording video of gaming with and
> without AQM (bloated vs unbloated), etc. Any suggestions on games that will
> really make this obvious & compelling – something cool and worthy of posting
> on YouTube?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
