On 02/21/2012 12:42 PM, Itamar O wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Gary<[email protected]> wrote:
On 02/20/2012 08:14 PM, Ian Wild wrote:
I'm planning to reach out to a couple of the GPL Plugin developers this
week to see how they would feel about allowing Bloodhound to use these
plugins under a different license. Hopefully we'll be able to find a way
forward on that, but if not I would think it's inevitable that we'll need
to build-in equivalent functionality.
Ian
I think we might need to add
http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/**CkEditorPlugin<http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/CkEditorPlugin>to
the list of plugins to investigate license on if it is preferable to
TracWysiwygPlugin. In this case, it is the underlying CkEditor that might
be the problem. It is multi-licensed as GPL/LGPL/MPL.
As I just mentioned in another thread, the CkEditorPlugin should not be a
problem, as I don't mind relicensing it as needed, as long as it plays well
with CKEditor's license.
Assuming licensing problems are solved, the real problems are maintenance
of the plugin... (no much work occurs these days)
I was about to reply to that...
I think that we should be interested in collaborating if the licensing
situation of CKEditor can be resolved. Thanks for the offer.
Cheers,
Gary
