I'm happy to review tomorrow, but won't be able to contribute before. - Joe
________________________ @jdreimann - Twitter Sent from my phone On 6 Jun 2012, at 00:27, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, sorry about this but I am a bit out of contact. I am effectively away > until next week but I would like to make some time to try to at least > contribute to the report. > > A few small things that immediately spring to mind that could be worth > pointing out are: > > * we have apparently had some limited growth in the community with people > providing code to the project > * the last report that I remember, I think we had talked about first commits > and now we appear to have a reasonable body of code that will form the bulk > of the initial release. > > I think from that it is clear that I haven't had time to come up with much! I > will try to make sure that I have some time to help review tomorrow. > > Sorry about the bad timing and a big thank you to Greg for the extra help! > > Cheers, > Gary > > > On 05/06/12 15:41, Greg Stein wrote: >> Offlist, I've heard both Gary and Hyrum are out of town. I'll write up >> something, but I will need the community to review it. >> >> Thx, >> -g >> On Jun 5, 2012 7:16 AM, "Hyrum K Wright"<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1, though I understand that yesterday and today are UK holidays. >>> >>> (I'm travelling at the moment, and can review, but not contribute to, >>> the report.) >>> >>> -Hyrum >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Greg Stein<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Gary: you wanna volunteer for the podling report this month? >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Jukka Zitting<[email protected]> >>>> Date: Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:28 PM >>>> Subject: June reports in two weeks >>>> To: general<[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> There's plenty of time still before the June reports [1] start flowing >>>> in. As an early remainder to podlings starting to draft their reports, >>>> here's how the IPMC saw your status as of the previous quarterly >>>> report in March [2]: >>>> >>>> IP clearance: Openmeetings >>>> No release: Bloodhound, Cordova, OpenOffice >>>> Low activity: Kalumet, Kato >>>> Low diversity: Bigtop, Etch, Isis, HCatalog, S4, Wave >>>> Ready to graduate: Flume >>>> >>>> Has the situation in your podling changed over the last three months? >>>> If not, what's your plan for improving the situation? Is there >>>> anything for which you'd appreciate more help? >>>> >>>> I'm especially worried about Kato as it seems like the project has >>>> more or less died even though the JSR 326 / Oracle trouble got finally >>>> sorted out. Is it time to retire the project or can we hope for a >>>> revival? >>>> >>>> I also wanted to start preparing for this reporting round in good time >>>> by assigning shepherds [3] already now. Using a fuzzy algorithm based >>>> on the available volunteers, their stated preferences, and the >>>> podlings they're already mentoring, I came up with the following >>>> initial assignments that I've also recorded on the wiki page: >>>> >>>> Benson Margulies - CloudStack, HCatalog, Kato >>>> Dave Fisher - Bloodhound, Flume >>>> Matt Franklin - Bigtop, Flex, Openmeetings >>>> Matt Hogstrom - Cordova, OpenOffice.org >>>> Jukka Zitting - Etch, Isis, S4 >>>> Mohammad Nour - Kalumet >>>> Ross Gardler - Wave >>>> >>>> Feel free to shuffle these around or ask for someone else to fill in >>>> if you're expecting to be too busy for the extra reviews in early >>>> June. Other IPMC members and interested observers, please jump in and >>>> volunteer as extra shepherds if you'd like to help this effort. >>>> >>>> As discussed earlier, shepherds are not there to replace existing >>>> mentors. If everything is going well with a project, the shepherd can >>>> simply acknowledge a report and move on. If there are any relevant >>>> questions that the report doesn't answer, the shepherd may ask the >>>> podling and its mentors for more details. And finally if something >>>> seems wrong, the shepherd should raise a flag for the mentors and the >>>> rest of the IPMC to focus on. Most importantly, we need to be talking >>>> *with* the podlings, not just *about* them, so especially any >>>> constructive and encouraging feedback to them will be highly useful. >>>> >>>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2012 >>>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2012 >>>> [3] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorShepherds >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> >>>> Jukka Zitting >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy >>> http://www.uberSVN.com/ >>> >
