On 6/29/12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi >
Hi ! > Oops. So it is.. Thanks for pointing that out. For now I'll note the > duplication in #120 and, hopefully, make it make more sense in the long > run. > ;) > I should mention that when I was writing #120 I thought it might be > better to separate out the Ticket side of this to a separate issue. +1 > Although I believe it should follow the general principle of greater > focus as suggested by #94 > (https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/94), focusing on an > individual Ticket, it will certainly have to show more types of events > than at other levels. > > There is also the question of distinguishing the roles of the activity > area and the 'Change History' area which is probably worth clearing up. > Effectively the design that Joe provided us with changes that Change > History area into a Comments only area (see > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/trunk/doc/html-templates/ticket.html). > > Taking that to a hopefully logical conclusion, the Activity area > effectively replaces the role of the Change History, showing *all* the > Ticket change history, except using truncated comments. so far I'm -0 about this . IMO all details of change history should be fully available in ticket view . [...] > > Anyway, I suspect that a full implementation of this approach is > unlikely to make it into the initial release. > +1 [...] -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
