On 11/15/12, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15.11.2012 16:33, Peter Koželj wrote: >> Maybe I misunderstood how this BEP thing should work. >> I think that the only correct way of doing this that conforms with Apache >> rules would be to discuss things on ML first. BEP is a nice add-on but >> can >> not be anything more then a summary of a ML discussion. >>
Well , in draft mode not necessarily . Draft proposals are work in progress so they may be all wrong , and even rejected outright or after some discussion. A Final BEP **MUST** actually include **ONLY** what's been agreed upon on the ML , but e.g. diagrams, pictures, mind maps, as well as very specific details might not reach the ML at all . the discussion about them , well definitely yes. ;) >> Could be that my interpretation of the ML role is a bit too "strict" :) > > The mailing list is the preferred discussion forum, sure. Which does not > imply that ideas and drafts should never appear anywhere else. > I agree . It is hard to understand a proposal and see it as a whole by putting all the parts together while reading ML discussion threads , without knowing whether something is ok or not . That's what proposals are for . To see the subject as a whole . ;) -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
