On 22/11/12 14:20, Andrej Golcov wrote:
On a technical note, is there any reason to specify text~= for a general
text query? I would have
thought that we could distinguish free text (as perhaps suggested below
in the examples below.)
Agreed and fixed the BEP accordingly.
I was hoping for a bit of a discussion around this point actually. I was
wondering whether I had missed some occasions where there is a
requirement for the ability to avoid ambiguity. In the end there is
always quoting and there should be a bracket notation so there may be no
requirement for text~= at all.
We will of course also require the ability to escape quoting and other
control characters within any new query language.
I would if there is much support for defining query languages any of the
suggested search backends.
Cheers,
Gary
