On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...] > > There seem to be two issues here: > > 1. Specifying the version in requirements.txt, which appears to be > > straightforward (4). > > 2. Keeping the older packages available for all of the plugins we depend > > on as newer versions of those packages are released, in order to give us > > time to evaluate the new version and upgrade bloodhound in a controlled > > manner. > > > > +1 > all this is needed , yes . > > I guess the thing to investigate next is whether we can host the packages currently on PyPI elsewhere, and have pip search that location first. Once I get that figured out (or if someone suggests a better way first), I'll create a ticket for this issue and move forward.
