With time to think about it, there are the email addresses in the cc fields
that should probably be swapped for fake ones. Anything else I missed?
Cheers,
Gary
On 20 December 2012 13:12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The work I did yesterday for a basic way of loading and dumping data was
> with the view to helping developers work with more realistic data.
>
> So, before I do anything too rash, would it make sense for us to use the
> database from issues.apache.org/bloodhound as a fixture?
>
> Perhaps with the exception of some entries in the permission table, I
> don't think there is anything much that is unavailable through the site
> itself with anonymous permissions so I don't *think* that there would be
> any sensitive data to worry about. It seems worth a sanity check anyway to
> see if I have missed anything.
>
> If that works for everyone, I don't intend to provide attachments as part
> of the fixtures yet. If, for example, you eventually wanted to test how the
> new search components are doing with the searching within attachments
> (assuming that this is something we would want to be able to do), this
> would not yet provide for that. Also, there will clearly be actual errors
> associated with the missing files. Also, I am only likely to keep
> permissions for the anonymous, authenticated and the 'admin' user who will
> get TRAC_ADMIN permissions but that should be fairly easy for developers to
> sort out.
>
> So, any concerns?
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
