On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Gary Martin <[email protected]>wrote:
> Perhaps I should not have been so soft on this idea. I really don't see > any advantage big enough in any of the suggestions for me to consider it > worth getting used to a new setup. Instead, I would encourage us to live > with what we have and find some more important issues to solve. > > Committers should feel free to set the priority of an issue if they feel > that the default middle priority level is incorrect. We also effectively > express priority by the placement of an issue in a specific milestone. > Well, disagreements aside, I do agree that this has been way over-discussed relative to its value. I'll move on and pick something else with Priority "major" or higher to work on.
