On 3/13/13 9:31 AM, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 3/13/13, Jure Zitnik <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/13/13 8:58 AM, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 3/13/13, Jure Zitnik <[email protected]> wrote:
On 3/13/13 5:18 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 13.03.2013 05:08, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 3/12/13, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
Author: jure
Date: Tue Mar 12 15:15:22 2013
New Revision: 1455576
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1455576
Log:
Renamed default product to '@',
@jure: why ?
Because it's a token that is forbidden as a product tag and therefore
cannot conflict with existing product names.
I'll ask the negation of the negation .
Why is it that we'll have to apply this change instead of sticking to
'' as global prefix?
Just to clarify things, we did not change '' as the global prefix. The
default product '@' is the product to which all the tickets w/o product
get migrated during upgrade process.
Oh ! Now I see ... and how will that data be retrieved if we use a
non-standard prefix ?
Don't see a problem with that as product prefix will only be validated
on product creation through UI.
Cheers,
Jure
