On 3/21/13, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 3/15/13, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Author: rjollos >> > Date: Fri Mar 15 11:03:43 2013 >> > New Revision: 1456892 >> > >> [...] >> > .searchable em { >> > - font-style: inherit; >> > - font-weight: bold; >> > + font-style: inherit; >> > + font-weight: bold; >> > } >> > >> >> This change (well ... the original including `font-weight : bold` ;) >> is breaking the basic notion of <em> tags being rendered in italics >> style . This has some impact on WikiFormatting , as well as other >> parts of the GUI . >> >> Please revert to what it was before . > > > That revision should have only changed the indentation to make it the same > throughout the file. The diff you show is only a change in indentation as > far as I can see. >
Very obvious . That's why I said «well ... the original including `font-weight : bold` ;)» . That one is where my local blame tool led me and I saw no point in tracking changes prior to that . The message is «that should not be bold , no matter where that change was applied in first place» . -- Regards, Olemis. Apache™ Bloodhound contributor http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
