On 25.03.2013 18:34, Joachim Dreimann wrote: > On 25 March 2013 17:24, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Apache Bloodhound < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> #185: Typeahead for usernames on 'assign to' fields >>> --------------------------+-------------------- >>> Reporter: jdreimann | Owner: nobody >>> Type: enhancement | Status: new >>> Priority: minor | Milestone: >>> Component: ui design | Version: >>> Resolution: | Keywords: gsoc >>> --------------------------+-------------------- >>> >>> Comment (by jdreimann): >>> >>> Replying to [comment:3 olemis]: >>> I've removed the GSoC tag because a solution to this already exists (see >>> gjm's coment). >>> >>> -- >>> Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/185#comment:4> >>> Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/> >>> The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker >>> >> The AutocompleteUsersPlugin needs some work to make it compatible with >> recent versions of jQuery. A patch was recently submitted that fixes most >> of the issues, but it needs to be refactored to eliminate a huge amount of >> JS code duplication. After I pull that patch in, we could start testing the >> plugin with Bloodhound. I could keep that on my near-term TODO list, and >> maybe have it ready for inclusion in Release 6. Thoughts? >> > It's fairly low priority in my opinion, but if it's easy and quick for you > to do, sure!
I suggest we tag such simple tasks as entry-level, for new contributors. As Joe says, they're too small for GSoC, and too low priority to worry about them ourselves, at least pre-1.0. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
