Egon Willighagen wrote: > Hi all, > > a number of bugs have been reported in the past for BODR, and a few more > reports were announced earlier this week. While the BO mailing list is the > obvious and true ML to use, and we also have SVN, BODR really needs a BTS > too. > > I have been thinking of simply setting up a SF project for just the BODR > project. Now that it is entering the first Linux distribution (Debian), and > that it even is mentioned in LinuxFormat, it really seems to take off now, > and a separate project page does not seem too bad. > > If no one disagrees within the next few days, I'll go ahead. If you support > this proposal, please let that be know too :)
I think this is a great idea. Nothing against CDK, but I don't use it so I found it odd to find BODR info at the CDK sf site. I'm certainly interested in BODR and I agree it's getting enough attention that it could use it's own site and BTS. +1 from me (not sure if I count or not ;-) ). -Jordan Mantha _______________________________________________ Blue-obelisk mailing list Blue-obelisk@hardly.cubic.uni-koeln.de http://hardly.cubic.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/blue-obelisk
