Paul,
If you are concerned that is too much (I don't and I think many of your
readers will understand why you are doing it), maybe just select a few key
structures. Also note that for extremely long InChI's Google does not index
the whole string. Moving towards InChIKeys should fix that problem though.
Jean-Claude
On 9/19/07, Paul Docherty wrote:
>
> Jean-Claude,
>
> The problem is the complexity of the structures I work with. As a
> crude estimate, the InChi data for the structures in my last post take
> up around 50 lines of text. There's only 25 lines of actual
> description there, so the InChi data takes up a considerable amount of
> space. If that space was useful to the majority of readers, it would
> be worth displaying, but it's not. The blog is read for it's general
> discussion of the strategy and disconnections, not the experimental
> specifics.
>
> Thanks for your thoughts.
>
> Paul
>
> Jean-Claude Bradley, Ph. D.
> E-Learning Coordinator for the College of Arts and Sciences
> Associate Professor of Chemistry
> Drexel University
>
> http://drexel-coas-elearning.blogspot.com
> http://drexel-coas-talks-mp3-podcast.blogspot.com/
> http://usefulchem.blogspot.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
