Hi Greg, On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Egon Willighagen >> SourceForge-- (for not giving a warning...) > > This criticism is unjustified. After the attacks on the site, the > folks at sf.net did send around an email announcing that there were > problems and that things would be changed. There have been regular > updates provided on progress.
Indeed they did say things would change. It is true that it is hard to predict what will get broken in the process. I do not remember those emails saying that existing MediaWiki installs would likely go down. But I should indeed have compensated the -- with the many ++'s SourceForge deserves for the free service they do provide. They are not perfect, but at the same time they provide an infinite value for money (literally)! Greg, thanx for correcting me! Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Institutet för miljömedicin Karolinska Institutet Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
