Thank you very much for this update, Bert. I have added it to Jmol as
atom.covalentRadius, and you can, for example, illustrate those in Jmol
14.1.11 using
{*}.radius = {*}.covalentRadius.all
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Wibe de Jong <wadej...@lbl.gov> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated the covalent radii for all 118 elements following the
> definition of one consistent set of radii published Pyykko and Atsumi in
> Chem. Eur. J. published in 2009. This addresses all elements for which the
> radii were not given (mainly heavy elements), and updates others.
>
> The git pull request can be found at https://github.com/egonw/bodr
>
> Please peer review, comment, and apply.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bert
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
> Read the Whitepaper.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
> Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
>
>
--
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
