Gita has invited me to talk on Wednesday 28 Jan to a group at NIPGR ( https://x.com/semanticClimate/status/2014277167136596211)
On "How do we assess [Structural Biology and small molecule design]". It's sponsored by CODATA and Schroedinger. I'm slightly out of touch with cheminformatics and would value up-to-date view. I want to make the point that we cannot easily access work that is not Open, and that we absolutely need Open ontologies and validation processes to do this effectively and impartially. This is possible in crystallography because of the Open ethos and requirement to share data, the CIF ontologies, the databanks, the Commissions on experimental data. In the BO we have tried to create shared open ontologies and syntaxes. How has this progressed? can we produce data in a sharable, frictionless form ? And have any large companies (esp Schoedinger) made useful contributions to Openness? P. "Semantic Climate with @BRIC_NIPGR, @CODATA_India <https://x.com/CODATA_India> , @schrodinger <https://x.com/schrodinger> hosts a pre-summit event for #IndiaAISummit2026 <https://x.com/hashtag/IndiaAISummit2026?src=hashtag_click>, featuring scientific talks linked to global research assessment reform (CODATA TG OT-ViRARe led by Gitanjali Yadav, Debasisa Mohanty, Peter MR, Adriana Baravalle) " -- Peter Murray-Rust Founder ContentMine.org and Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics Dept. Of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK
_______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
