Yea, I knew that. But that doesn't explain why the second Gig-E port doesn't show. I believe that the GUI is only written to support a single network interface. There is no provision in it for a second one.
Chuck ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Mark E. Levy" <[email protected]> To: BlueOnyx General Mailing List <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:19:47 -0500 Subject: [BlueOnyx:01958] Re: IP Addressing on sites > The management FastEthernet port on these HP boxesare not available to the > OS. You set an IP address in the BIOS and access thelights-out management > interface using a web browser. You can view the consoleif you buy the right > management license > > Mark levy > ETA > > > From: [email protected][mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Chuck Tetlow > Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:08 PM > To: Gerald Waugh; BlueOnyx General Mailing List > Subject: [BlueOnyx:01957] Re: IP Addressing on sites > > Actually, these new HP servers havethree ports. Two Gig-E and one > FastEthernet for management. > > But the GUI doesn't even know there is more than one. It merely allowsyou to > set a IP on the server - which luckily turns up on the first Gig-Eport. > There is nothing else in the GUI to set up additional ports (likeeth1 or > eth2). > > Chuck > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: "Gerald Waugh" <[email protected]> > To: "BlueOnyx General Mailing List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:44:44 -0500 > Subject: [BlueOnyx:01956] Re: IP Addressing on sites > > > Chuck Tetlow wrote ================ > > Hi BlueOnyx experts. Maybe one of you know a resolution to a IPAddressing > > problem. > > > > One of the companies has a bunch of BlueQuartz servers that they've got me > > converting to BlueOnyx. But BlueOnyx has the IP addressing issueBlueQuartz > > had. Specifically, whatever IP address you put on the box (eth0) -it > > copies that same netmask to the IPs for the sites. > > > > Since this company wants to keep all the "box" addresses in asimilar > > network, they have a /28 network for their virtual servers. Thenthey > > assign a class-C /24 block to the sites on each server. Theproblem is the > > BlueOnyx keeps the same /28 subnet mask on the subinterfaces for thesites. > > And that means that we loose the ability to use two IPs out of every 16(its > > considering one of them a network identifier and one a broadcast). > > > > So, what I'm looking for is a way to set the netmask on the subinterfaces > > for the sites. In the past, I've spent a lot of time going througheach > > ifcfg-eth0:xx with VI correcting the mask and broadcast IPs. Then to > > prevent the system modifing those interfaces again the next time a site was > > added - I had to set the immutable bit on them. Which of coursemeans that > > I'm the only one that can delete a site - because I have to turn that off > > first. Not a good fix. But I don't know any other method. > > > > Does anyone know how to change the netmask and broadcast on all the > > subinterfaces - and get the management GUI to use something other thanwhat > > is assigned to eth0 (when creating new sites)?? > > ================================= > > > > Naybe if you have two eth ports, > > put the /24 on one and the /28 on the other > > Not sure how the GUI handles that, just a thought. > > > > Gerald > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blueonyx mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx > ------- End of Original Message ------- ------- End of Original Message -------
_______________________________________________ Blueonyx mailing list [email protected] http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
