My server is (a lowly) Pentium 4 HT anyway, as a personal business server, it rarely even breaths heavy... besides, an in place upgrade doesn't imply an architecture change, and updating any additional software installed from 32 to 64 bit in an automated process would be a nightmare...
Guess I'll sit tight on my current version as long as I can. Jeff On Dec 24, 2010, at 3:44 AM, Taco Scargo wrote: > Well, I think (but I need to discuss that with Michael) that we will have a > 32 and 64 bit version > > With regards, > > Taco Scargo > [email protected] > > > On 24 dec 2010, at 05:58, Gerald Waugh wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 03:31 +0100, Taco Scargo wrote: >>> Jeff, >>> >>> It is too early to tell. My goal is to be able to 'upgrade', but we have >>> tried this as well for the BQ->BX upgrade, and were unsuccessful. >>> We will first need to have a working BX based on CentOS 6. Then we can >>> fiddle around and try to create an upgrade path. >>> >>> Ofcourse CMU will always be an option. >> >> I understand that the BX-CentOS-6.x will be compiled for the 64 bit >> architecture.s >> So one must understand that the CPU in a system to be upgraded must have >> a CPU supporting the 64 bit architecture. >> >> -- >> Gerald >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Blueonyx mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx > > > _______________________________________________ > Blueonyx mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx _______________________________________________ Blueonyx mailing list [email protected] http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
