Yes, its in-house only, but still has a public facing.
We use it as a distro for our inter-office emails, group emails, etc. (eg, email all branch managers, email all users at a single site, receive email from vendors on a generic mailbox where the message needs to hit multiple internal users, etc) Honestly, if there were a way to rip the display interface out of the raq4 and plop it into the BO, you couldn't get much more perfect for us. >From the screenshots I have seen, its still not quite up to par. (yes, the bar is VERY high) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Harvey Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:09 PM To: BlueOnyx General Mailing List Subject: [BlueOnyx:06842] Re: better majordomo GUI? If this is an in-house box, take a look at webmin. I don't know if it will do everything that you want, but it is a good tool to have. Doug On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:01 PM, webmaster <[email protected]> wrote: I use phplist for serious mailings now >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01CBEF2C.87985CE0" >Content-Language: en-us > >Anyone know of a GUI solution for Majordomo that doesn't suck as bad >as the Raq550 and later implementation? > >We actively use Majordomo in-house for distribution lists, and it >works well for us. Too bad the changes Sun made to the 550 made it >totally unusable for large numbers of lists. Anyone who has tried to >use a 550 with a large number of lists probably knows what I mean. >When we migrated from our Raq4 to a new 550, we reverted back to the >Raq4 for the lists within 48 hours it was so bad and unusable. > >Ideally an interface like the Raq4 would be perfect (specifically >the ability to list all lists on a single page(or at least a page >selection by letter), and display the members of each list on that >page for easy reference). My manager who runs the lists loves that >layout to death, and is perfect for her. Too bad it presently means >we actually run a Raq4 in production years later. It all works great >until somebody decides to send a 2mb attachment to the entire group >of 800 users, which literally slows the system down to the point it >takes half a day to burn through the entire list of messages. I'm >just waiting for that box to fall over dead, as its well beyond its >usable life. > >Anyone have any ideas for existing solutions? I REALLY don't like >the idea of continuing to run this old Raq4, and also don't like the >price tag quoted by a developer to recreate it for us on our BO >platform. Reinventing the wheel just isn't my idea of a good time. > > > >Thank you, > > >Roy Urick >IT Department >Koorsen Fire & Security >2719 N Arlington Ave >Indianapolis, IN 46218 >317-225-5027 (IP Phone x2796) > > >_______________________________________________ >Blueonyx mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx _______________________________________________ Blueonyx mailing list [email protected] http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
_______________________________________________ Blueonyx mailing list [email protected] http://www.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
