That's the way it worked for me Michael. 

They just port scan the IP, and look up what usually runs on that port.  I had some stuff running on odd-ball ports on the router in front of the server.  Their port scan detected the ports, and refused to pass the PCI Compliance until I shut it down. 

In my case, they couldn't even have checked for a response, to see what prompt or response came back (and guess the service/program from that) - because it was encrypted.  But they saw they could make a connection to those odd-ball ports, and that was enough for them to say NO WAY!


Chuck


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Michael Stauber <mstau...@blueonyx.it>
To: blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
Sent: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 12:10:04 -0500
Subject: [BlueOnyx:22364] Re: PCI - lighttpd

> Hi Tim,
>
> > Here is the report from doing
> >
> > netstat -tupan|grep LISTEN
> >
> > Nothing for port 42443
> >
> > Correct?
>
> Correct.
>
> > Could nginx be effecting their PCI scans?
>
> No. When you acticate Nginx, Apache releases port 443 and Nginx binds to
> port 443. Port 42443 isn't involved in that.
>
> I wonder how they came to the conclusion that lighttpd was running on
> port 42443. Did they have access to the server for the check? If not,
> then all they could do was a portscan, which is not really conclusive
> without further analysis of what was going on at that port.
>
> --
> With best regards
>
> Michael Stauber
> _______________________________________________
> Blueonyx mailing list
> Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
> http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
------- End of Original Message -------
_______________________________________________
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx

Reply via email to