I can't believe the back and forth over :hover font color! ;)

And now I'm adding to it!

Define it or don't - it won't impact a front-end designer for more than 3
sec.

Kevin


On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Chris Eppstein <ch...@eppsteins.net> wrote:

> It's very hard for a CSS framework to provide both attractive defaults and
> design flexibility. If you find yourself bumping to the limitations of
> blueprint, you should consider using the Sass port of Blueprint within
> Compass. It's easy to set these constants to whatever color you like:
>
> http://compass-style.org/docs/reference/blueprint/colors/#const-link-color
>
> chris
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:20 PM, David Merrick <merrick...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> In the Blueprint CSS a:hover would have been selected to balck. To
>> override this you need  to into the blueprint css screen file, find the
>> a:hover ttag css and change it to green
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Hector Virgen <djvir...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest removing "a:hover" and any other a:pseudo-selector styles and
>>> providing just plain old "a" styles. While I appreciate that BP provides
>>> sensible defaults, it creates extra work (however minimal) for a web
>>> designer when they need to adjust link colors for their site. For example,
>>> if the site's links should be green, a designer would need to overwrite at
>>> least 3 CSS selectors:
>>>
>>> a, a:focus, a:hover{
>>>     color: green;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Just my 2c :)
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Hector Virgen*
>>> Sr. Web Developer
>>> Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Online
>>> http://www.virgentech.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:26 AM, rebus_ <r.dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28 August 2010 16:45, Christian Montoya <siro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:06 PM, 24/7 <2...@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>> >> Good point. Maybe the whole text could be #313131, links underlined +
>>>> #000
>>>> >> or #009ee0. Dark grey makes reading easier than black and black would
>>>> stand
>>>> >> out for the links (with the underline). That would be decent. In the
>>>> other
>>>> >> version I’d prever #009ee0 = cyan, because it’s not that hard, more
>>>> friendly
>>>> >> and pretty close to the default link color.
>>>> >
>>>> > When Blueprint was first launched, links were gray by default and
>>>> > black when hovered. If my memory serves me correctly, I convinced the
>>>> > original developers to change the default link color to some kind of
>>>> > blue... and that's how we ended up in this current situation, where
>>>> > links are dark blue by default and black when hovered. No one has ever
>>>> > complained about this, until now, so let's make this thread the
>>>> > official place for people to sound off:
>>>> >
>>>> > a:hover should be...
>>>> >
>>>> > - black (#000)
>>>> > - the same as a:link
>>>> > - a lighter blue (like cyan)
>>>> > - something else...
>>>> >
>>>> >> The longer the list get’s, the closer I am to release 0.9.2 on my
>>>> own.
>>>> >
>>>> > I've posted requests to the list in the past asking for more
>>>> > contributors. The truth is that there is only a small handful of
>>>> > people who have been contributing over the past year, and there is a
>>>> > long list of updates that need to be made to the Blueprint core.
>>>> > Furthermore, github.org has a great fork & pull-request system that
>>>> > allows anyone to make updates to Blueprint, by working on their own
>>>> > fork, and then submit those changes to the core, by sending a
>>>> > pull-request to Joshua Clayton (not me). So if you want to help make
>>>> > 0.9.2 a reality, and have my eternal gratitude, well, now you know
>>>> > how.
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > --
>>>> > Christian Montoya
>>>> > mappdev.com :: christianmontoya.net
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Blueprint CSS" group.
>>>> > To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<blueprintcss%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>> .
>>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I have thought about this in several occasions but never gotten around
>>>> to do anything about it.
>>>>
>>>> Currently we have (i think :):
>>>>
>>>> a:focus,
>>>> a:hover     { color: #000; }
>>>> a             { color: #009; text-decoration: underline; }
>>>>
>>>> First, I would like to see :hover, :focus and :active (currently
>>>> undefined) a bit brighter so it is easier to spot the change of colour
>>>> thus recognizing the text as hyper link (I like red so I'll suggest it
>>>> as my choice but I am no designer and not very good with colour
>>>> picking).
>>>>
>>>> Second, I am of opinion that blue is ok colour for link itself since
>>>> it has been the default colour for links in most browsers for ages.
>>>>
>>>> Third, perhaps it would be nice to introduce :visited in
>>>> typography.css too? I would keep it same colour as link by default (i
>>>> think you mostly don't want links changing colour in menus etc, while
>>>> you would like to do that for some article list or something so you
>>>> would define :visited only on that set of links,  but I could be
>>>> totally off here.)
>>>>
>>>> Maybe something like:
>>>>
>>>> a:hover, a:active {color:#F00}
>>>> a, a:link, a:visited { color: #009; text-decoration: underline; }
>>>>
>>>> My -0,2€
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Davor Lučić
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Blueprint CSS" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<blueprintcss%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Blueprint CSS" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<blueprintcss%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Merrick
>>
>> merrick...@gmail.com
>>
>> Ph   03 3423 121
>> Cell 027 3089 169
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Blueprint CSS" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<blueprintcss%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Blueprint CSS" group.
> To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<blueprintcss%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Blueprint CSS" group.
To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.

Reply via email to