Oh sorry, I didn't read that carefully!. I understand your point, but still a similar technique may be shipped through a plug in that states its limitations clearly, so blueprint's core code would not be compromised, unless someone really wants to use that plug in being already aware of what it implies.
Still we would need to find the right work arounds. But I think I can collaborate by googling a bit more on this. "Sean K. Stewart" <speed...@gmail.com> escribió: >Daniel, > >Have you been to the positioniseverything.com article lately? The >first thing I notice on the page is this: >"Several problems have been found with this technique since >publication. Those problems are discussed in Appendix J [http:// >www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/appendix/equalheightproblems]" > >Still a very cool technique. Thanks for sharing. Not sure it would be >good to add to a stable CSS framework such as Blueprint. > >-- >Sean K. Stewart > > >On Nov 2, 11:07 am, Daniel Peraza <danielper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> El 02/11/10 10:24, Sean K. Stewart escribi : >> >> > Hey Daniel, >> >> > Smooth trick!! I like it a lot, but it seems limited. Not only limited >> > in height (where did you come up with the number 32767?), but also >> > cross browser? Which I think would hinder the inclusion into >> > Blueprint. >> >> 32767 is the biggest signed integer a computer can store with 16 bits. >> It doesn't have to be this way, it is just meant to be a representation >> of an unbounded or infinitum length. >> >> > Do you have any more resources for using this technique? I want to >> > learn more about how you came to this solution. Thanks >> >> This is just a technique I've been using a lot since the first time I >> read this article: >> >> http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/equalheight >> >> So far, I haven't had any cross-browser problems. >> >> > On Nov 2, 10:25 am, Daniel Peraza<danielper...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi guys!. What do you think if we include the following rules into the >> >> blueprint code: >> >> >> .equal-height >> >> { >> >> overflow:hidden; >> >> >> } >> >> >> .equal-height> div { >> >> padding-bottom:32767px; >> >> margin-bottom:-32767px; >> >> >> } >> >> >> Thus, if we have the following code: >> >> >> <div class="container equal-height"> >> >> <div class="column span-4"> >> >> <p>This is the sidebar</p> >> >> </div> >> >> <div class="column span-16"> >> >> <p>Here goes the main content</p> >> >> </div> >> >> <div class="column span-4 last"> >> >> <p>This is the right column</p> >> >> </div> >> >> </div> >> >> >> We may achieve equal height multicolumn layouts. What do you think? > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Blueprint CSS" group. >To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Blueprint CSS" group. To post to this group, send email to blueprint...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to blueprintcss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
