the license of STLPort is like: /* * Copyright (c) 1999 * Boris Fomitchev * * This material is provided "as is", with absolutely no warranty expressed * or implied. Any use is at your own risk. * * Permission to use or copy this software for any purpose is hereby granted * without fee, provided the above notices are retained on all copies. * Permission to modify the code and to distribute modified code is granted, * provided the above notices are retained, and a notice that the code was * modified is included with the above copyright notice. * */ Everybody can check this content in the source code of STLport. So, I think that we should recommand the developers to use STLport as c++ library.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Ting Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact, list.h is not part of our code. It is generated by the C++ > compiler. Our code doesn't comprise any STL or c++ lib code. > C++ compiler and c++ lib can be chosen according to the opinion of the > developers. If the developer want to deliver linked program under ASL, > he/she must chose a c++ lib according to ASL. The program code doesn't > comprise any problem of c++ lib. > > So, I think source code can be checked to the repo. But we should told the > developers to link the the program with ASL compatible C++ lib if he/she > want to deliver binary program under ASL. > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Shan Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 8/25/08, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:15, Samul Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> i wrote a mail to Boris Fomitchev,he assured me that stlport don't >> collide >> >> with ASL >> > >> > > -- Best regards! Ting Peng ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [CN] +86-137-721-59621
