GNU LGPLThe LGPL is ineligible primarily due to the restrictions it places on larger works, violating the third license criterion. Therefore, LGPL-licensed works must not be included in Apache products. i guess it's end of story.We can't use ffmpeg and must find a substitute.
2008/9/28 Samul Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2008/9/25 > Subject: Re: is it legal to use FFmpeg? > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Samul Kevin wrote: > > > > 2008/9/25 William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Shipping LGPL isn't allowed, but as an /optional/ dependency it's > > > possible for projects to offer support to it. > > > > > Please review http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html and discuss with > the incubating project's mentors. This issue was asked and answered about > two years ago when bluesky sought incubation. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions > and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for > official ASF policies and documents. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU > -- Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU
