[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13619466#comment-13619466
]
Aaron McCurry commented on BLUR-64:
-----------------------------------
In regards to your first question. Yes we will need a reference to the
tablecontext object. Currently in 0.1.5 there is not a cache of it anywhere, we
should probably create a cache and put references to the cache in both the
distributedindexserver class and the indexmanager class (where the queryparser
is used). The cache could be as simple as a map but will need to follow the
enabling and disabling of tables.
As for your second question I'm not sure I understand. If you are referring to
the query parser in the blur-query project the query would look like
(super:<a.b:word a.c:word> +super:<d.b:word>). The super query is no longer
implied.
Let me know what you think. Thanks!
Aaron
> Update to use the new SuperQueryParser
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: BLUR-64
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-64
> Project: Apache Blur
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.1.5
> Reporter: Aaron McCurry
> Fix For: 0.1.5
>
>
> In the 0.2-dev branch and the blur-query project there is a updated
> SuperQueryParser class that should be used in place of the legacy
> SuperQueryParser that is found in the blur-core project.
> NOTE: The blur-query project has already been merged into the 0.1.5 branch.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
