On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > In updating the rules for RAT in maven I have gone through all the issues > that are in the rat.txt file. > > I don't think these Javascript libraries are accounted for in the LICENSE > file:
Hmm... I think the console wasn't previously in the binary artifact (was only in src) so I only accounted for them in LICENSE-src.txt. If the console is now shipping with the binary convenience artifact, then I can account for them there. I'm wondering if we ought to treat minified in the same way as binary? In other words, ship the unminified with -src and minify it on build ourselves? To kick this thing out the door for now, I agree with Patrick that maybe we should just punt and ship unminified? For Gemfile.lock, I'd think since it's generated we could argue it falls under an exception[1]? For the rails script, who wrote it? If NIC, it looks like comments are allowed so why not just add the standard header? --tim [1] - http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
