You need to ask a chair to run the following command on people.a.o modify_appgroups.pl hudson-jobadmin --add=<user>
on your user id. After which you will have karma to admin on jenkins. I can't do it - Doug or another mentor that has perms? Patrick On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Patrick, > > Agreed. The issue with the jdk6 master build is that the dependencies are > not installed. On a local machine if the libraries in the local repo under > org/apache/blur are deleted and you cd into one of the modules (blur-core) > and run "mvn clean test" it will fail because it can't find some other blur > dependences. The command that needs to be run is "mvn -am -pl blur-core > clean test" from the root (parent pom directory). I'm not sure how to > modify jenkins to make happen, or if there's a way to get jenkins to just > run the build from the root. Either way I would be happy to tinker with it > to get it right so that way you don't have mess with it whenever we make a > change. > > Aaron > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> fwiw the Blur jenkins jobs are not green. Might be good to have these >> green as part of your release process: (not a blocker though). You can >> see the issues here: >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Blur/ >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Blur/job/Blur-master-jdk6/ >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Blur/job/Blur-master-jdk7/ >> >> LMK if you need tweaks, you can also be added as a jenkins admin if >> you want to manage these (add more, etc...) yourselves. >> >> Patrick >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I am canceling the vote and working through the issues that phunt posted. >> > We will cut a new release once these issues are addressed. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Aaron >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Agreed, I'm changing the assembly plugin to pull them in during the >> binary >> >> artifact creation. Thanks. >> >> >> >> Aaron >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Doug Cutting <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > An aside - why do you need to distribute generated files in the >> source >> >>> > artifact? Perhaps consider not committing/including them? (only in >> the >> >>> > bin) >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> +1 I think it's best if the source release is nearly identical to a >> clean >> >>> checkout of the release tag, and we should avoid committing generated >> >>> files >> >>> unless the generating software is not easily available to all >> developers >> >>> (which is not great either). >> >>> >> >>> Doug >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
